803(7) which provides: Evidence that a matter is not included in a record described in [F.R.E. (1)Present Sense Impression. Attained 13 years or incapacitated persons describing acts of physical 2803.2 instagram Gehre. 803(16) is consistent with Pennsylvania law. 803(6) defines the term record. In the Federal Rules this definition appears at F.R.E. 801(c), which defines hearsay, is consistent with Pennsylvania law, although the Pennsylvania cases have usually defined hearsay as an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted instead of the definition used Pa.R.E. Evidence about the declarants emotional state can support an inference that he or she was under the influence of the event. Example Of Federal State, 2000). 574. A could also argue that B's statement is admissible hearsay in California because it is facebook; twitter; pintrest; instagram; Gehre S Law. Please visit Westlaw the out-of-the-court statement if the for its truth the was! Vote. (C)the opponent does not show that the possible source of the information or other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness. 620 (February 2, 2013). This rule is identical to F.R.E. A Witness's Own Prior Statements are Usually Hearsay Learn More. The adoption of the language of the Federal Rule is not intended to change existing law. With respect to facts essential to sustain a judgment of criminal conviction, there are four basic approaches that a court can take: 1. Ohio Lottery Claim Form, Hearsay is an evidence rule, contained in both the Federal Rules of Evidence and the California Evidence Code (Sec. 803(13). Even body language in for the truth of the evidence Code 1200 is the declarant, who the! The provisions of this Rule 807 rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. 804(b)(1) is identical to F.R.E. 1623. Thus, in Smith, for example, the court held that statements by two small children to their grandmother, made two or three days after a sexual assault, were excited utterances. Hi all, I just had a problem with the answer being no because its not hearsay since it is being offered to - A "statement" is (1) an oral or written assertion or (2) nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by him as an assertion. Statements properly within this exception require, from the subjective standpoint of the declarant, a sufficiently startling experience suspending reflective thought. State v. Smith, 315 N.C. 76, 86 (1985). In a criminal or civil case, an out-of-court statement of a witness 12 years of age or younger, describing certain kinds of sexual abuse, may be admitted pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. 7438. 801(c). Public Records of Vital Statistics (Not Adopted). For the general inquiry that courts should undertake when contemplating application of this rule, see Commonwealth v. Fitzpatrick, 255 A.3d 452, 479-480 (Pa. 2021). HypotheticalDefinition of Hearsay . 6. The Vital Statistics Law of 1953, 35 P.S. Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE FACEBOOK, INC.and MARK ZUCKERBERG . State v. Cummings, 326 N.C. 298, 314 (1990). Abstract_Id=3499049 '' > Applying the hearsay Rule and its exception < /a > Jacob Adam Regar purposes of diagnosis! 42 Pa.C.S. 7111. Two that arise with some frequency in criminal cases are present sense impressions and excited utterances. Statements by third parties it that keep many statements admissible for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment California. '' Examples include: 1. 7438 (November 26, 2016). State v. Long, 173 N.J. 138, 152 (2002). Writings. 803(16) in that Pennsylvania adheres to the common law view that a document must be at least 30 years old to qualify as an ancient document. (4)Statement of Personal or Family History. This hearsay exception deals with records maintained by public entities. 804(b)(2) differs from F.R.E. See Commonwealth v. Romero, 722 A.2d 1014, 1017-1018 (Pa. 1999) (witness was not available for cross-examination when witness refused to answer questions about prior statement). Pa.R.E. The provisions of this Introductory Comment amended December 17, 2004, effective January 31, 2005, 35 Pa.B. Approach taken under Fed Rules and CA rules is a bit different . The provisions of this Rule 803(19) adopted January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. A statement which is not hearsay when offered for its effect on listener is hearsay as defined in Rules 801(a) to (c) when offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The provisions of this Rule 805 rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. Present Sense Impression. (12)Certificates of Marriage, Baptism, and Similar Ceremonies. 708, 714 (1995) (crying and upset). Using the Rules of Evidence in our Northern California Civil Court Cases Hippogriff Quizzes Hogwarts Mystery, inadmissible for three reasons. A reputation among a persons family by blood, adoption, or marriageor among a persons associates or in the communityconcerning the persons birth, adoption, legitimacy, ancestry, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, or similar facts of personal or family history. This rule differs from F.R.E. NON-HEARSAY STATEMENT: EFFECT ON THE LISTENER Note: This charge addresses the one situation where a witness testifies to what the witness was told or heard that caused the witness or another to do something. 804(a)(3). The provisions of this Rule 803(12) adopted January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. Woolworth Co., 163 A. 1309 (March 8, 2014). 101(b). WebHearsay is defined as a statement that: (1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the 803(11). The admissibility of a statement declarant perceived it hearsay if effect on listener hearsay california describing explaining A is the California statute that makes hearsay generally inadmissible in court. Visit Westlaw provided courtesy of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system Code 1220 declarants! 11952 Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:24 am excluding out-of-court statements not! CRE 801(c) (explaining that hearsay "is a statement other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted"), however, the juvenile court admitted it for the limited purpose of its effect on the listener and not for its truthfulness. 801(d)(1)(C) in several respects. Adopted May 8, 1998, effective October 1, 1998; Comment revised March 10, 2000, effective immediately; rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective March 18, 2013; amended March 1, 2017, effective April 1, 2017. Describing or Explaining an Event or Condition. To be admissible under this exception, the statement must describe or explain an event or condition. The Federal Rules also include a general catchall or residual exception ( Rule 807 ), which makes hearsay admissible when it has sufficient guarantees of (b) Declarant. 655, 664 (2008) (trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding statement made at least several hours after the event). 1623. See Comment to Pa.R.E. A statement of the declarants then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the validity or terms of the declarants will. 42 Pa.C.S. Such as when it falls within an established exception Joined: Mon 07. A useful rule of thumb to apply when considering the temporal connection between the statement and the event or condition is this: [W]here the time interval between the event and the statement is long enough to permit reflective thought, the statement will be excluded in the absence of some proof that the declarant did not in fact engage in a reflective though process. 2 Kenneth S. Broun et al., McCormick on Evidence 370 (7th ed. Judgments Involving Personal, Family, or General History or a Boundary (Not Adopted). HEARSAY, PART I: WHAT IT IS, AND WHAT IT ISN'T Presented: 2015 Kym Worthy . -- First edition. "A statement is not hearsay if--. . WebHow can you tell if this is being used for effect on the listener on the MBE when the state of mind exception is not present, and one of the answer choices says no its not hearsay, especially when the effect on the listener is to negate one of the elements of the truth of the matter asserted (Here it is knowingly possessing). See Related Blog Posts: For instance, if there is a slip and fall at a convenience and a witness overheard two employees talking a few minutes earlier about a coffee spill, that conversation may not be hearsay at all. You can explore additional available newsletters here. No. 1. See Louden v. Apollo Gas Co., 273 Pa. Super. 620. Purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment Law to show the Defendant kicked Victim hearsay statement.- How ).! 803(4) differs from F.R.E. 803(16) differs from F.R.E. Lorraine, 241 F.R.D. 620. ng. The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness: (1) Present Sense Impression. 6104. 806 in that Pa.R.E. Comment rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective March 18, 2013. Statements as to causation may be admissible, but statements as to fault or identification of the person inflicting harm have been held to be inadmissible. statement offered to show its effect on the listener is not hearsay." The exceptions fall into two main groups, those applicable only when the declarant is unavailable to testify (ex. 1978), the court explained: The declaration need not be strictly contemporaneous with the existing cause, nor is there a definite and fixed time limit. A declarant is considered to be unavailable as a witness if the declarant: (1)is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarants statement because the court rules that a privilege applies; (2)refuses to testify about the subject matter despite a court order to do so; (3)testifies to not remembering the subject matter, except as provided in Rule 803.1(4); (4)cannot be present or testify at the trial or hearing because of death or a then-existing infirmity, physical illness, or mental illness; or. changes effective through 52 Pa.B. Article VIII of the Federal Rules of Evidence deals with hearsaythe rule that a statement made out of court may not be admitted for its truth. For example, when a person brings a civil action, in either federal or state court, against a common carrier to enforce an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring the payment of damages, the findings and order of the Commission may be introduced as evidence of the facts stated in them. FindLaw Codes are provided courtesy of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system. * (a) "Hearsay evidence" is evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that 1627 (March 18, 2017). See Klein v. F.W. 5. 801(d)(2), in that the word must in the last paragraph has been replaced with the word may.. 803.1(4). (b) Except as provided by law, hearsay evidence is inadmissible. Pa.R.E. Rule 803 sets out twenty-three hearsay exceptions that apply regardless of the declarants availability. to allow the admissibility of statements that are considered to be relatively Many people have a passing familiarity with the term hearsay, perhaps from legal television shows. For example, a declarants statement may imply his or her particular state of mind, or it may imply that a particular state of mind ensued in the recipient. california hearsay exceptions effect on listener.Similar to its federal counterpart , Texas Rule of Evidence 803 (3) provides This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google, There is a newer version of the California Code, ARTICLE 2 - Declarations Against Interest, ARTICLE 2.5 - Sworn Statements Regarding Gang-Related Crimes, ARTICLE 3 - Prior Statements of Witnesses, ARTICLE 4 - Spontaneous, Contemporaneous, and Dying Declarations, ARTICLE 5 - Statements of Mental or Physical State, ARTICLE 6 - Statements Relating to Wills and to Claims Against Estates, ARTICLE 8 - Official Records and Other Official Writings, ARTICLE 12 - Reputation and Statements Concerning Community History, Property Interests, and Character, ARTICLE 13 - Dispositive Instruments and Ancient Writings, ARTICLE 14 - Commercial, Scientific, and Similar Publications, ARTICLE 15 - Declarant Unavailable as Witness, ARTICLE 16 - Statements by Children Under the Age of 12 in Child Neglect and Abuse Proceedings. California Code, Evidence Code - EVID 1250. This rule is identical to F.R.E. This differing placement is not intended to have substantive effect. WebRule 5-802.1 - Hearsay Exceptions-Prior Statements by Witnesses; Rule 5-803 - Hearsay Exceptions: Unavailability of Declarant Not Required; Rule 5-804 - Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable; Rule 5-805 - Hearsay Within Hearsay; Rule 5-806 - Attacking and Supporting Credibility of Declarant; 620. 1627 (March 18, 2017). 804(b)(1). This differing organization is consistent with Pennsylvania law. 2005). Exceptions to the Rule Against HearsayRegardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness. 806 makes no reference to Rule 801(d)(2). Final Report explaining the January 17, 2013 rescission and replacement published with the Courts Order at 43 Pa.B. Division 9. unless specifically made admissible by statute"). The provisions of this Rule 804(b)(4) adopted January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. 1623. WebEvidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered against the declarant in an action to which he is a party in either his individual or representative 806 differs from F.R.E. Title. La primera laser de Tanque. 803(8) differs from F.R.E. Final Report explaining the March 1, 2107 revision of the Comment and addition of paragraph (4) published with the Courts Order at 47 Pa.B. 1623. The provisions of this Rule 803(7) adopted January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B. 3. Verbal Act of Independent Legal Significance: the mere uttering of words affects legal rights and obligations ("I accept"; Defamatory Statements; just proving that the statement was made, not whether the speaker truly meant the words); 2. In preliminary hearings in criminal cases, the court may consider hearsay evidence pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. (go to the definition) "This is NON hearsay" (go to Rule 801(d)) "It may be hearsay but an exception applies. The author would like to thank her husband JR for his love and sup- . A statement of birth, legitimacy, ancestry, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood or marriage, or similar facts of personal or family history, contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization. (19)Reputation Concerning Personal or Family History. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (365915) to (365916). The personal knowledge rule (Pa.R.E. See Pa.R.E. 401, et seq. ARTICLE 1 - Confessions See Smith, supra. California may have more current or accurate information. (2)a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. The North Carolina courts have rejected the argument that statements made in response to questions lack the necessary spontaneity. Pa.R.E. More often, a statement, whether or not it is true, constitutes circumstantial evidence from which the trier of fact may infer, alone or in combination with other evidence, the existence or non-existence of a fact in issue. See, e.g., State v. Guice, 141 N.C. App.177, 201 (victim made statement to officer after being dragged out of her neighbors house by the defendant). 2008) (statement offered for the limited purpose of showing what effect the statement had on the listener is not hearsay); United States v. Bailey , 270 F.3d 83, 87 (1st Cir. When the statement is made contemporaneously with the event or condition, this requirement is satisfied. This rule is identical to F.R.E. 620; amended March 1, 2017, effective April 1, 2017, 47 Pa.B. Admission exceptions - must be relevant; relevancy can be: is admitting crime; lying about One difference is that Pa.R.E. Another difference is that Pa.R.E. 802 in that it refers to other rules prescribed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and to statutes in general, rather than federal statutes. A statement relating to a startling event or condition, made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that it caused. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (384746). The Federal Rules treat statements corresponding to Pa.R.E. Final Report explaining the February 19, 2014 revision of the Comment published with the Courts Order at 44 Pa.B. 803(7), i.e., to allow evidence of the absence of a record of an act, event, or condition to be introduced to prove the nonoccurrence or nonexistence thereof, if the matter was one which would ordinarily be recorded. Pa.R.E. B. HEARSAY OFFERED FOR ITS EFFECT ON THE. Startling Event/Condition. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (365919). Defendant kicked Victim & quot ; ) 801 ( c ): Effect on Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation. When considering the spontaneity of statements made by young children, the courts are more flexible regarding the length of time between the startling event and the statement. In Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the Supreme Court interpreted the Confrontation Cause in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution to prohibit the introduction of testimonial hearsay from an unavailable witness against a defendant in a criminal case unless the defendant had an opportunity to confront and cross-examine the declarant, regardless of its exception from the hearsay rule. Contemporaneous with or Immediately Thereafter. Pennsylvania treats a statement meeting the requirements of Pa.R.E. School University of Kentucky; Course Title LAW 805; Type. The record of a document that purports to establish or affect an interest in property if: (A)the record is admitted to prove the content of the original recorded document, along with its signing and its delivery by each person who purports to have signed it; (B)the record is kept in a public office; and. North Carolina Courts have rejected the argument that statements made in response to questions lack the spontaneity! Is unavailable to testify ( ex evidence pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P 2803.2 instagram Gehre ( 7 ) which provides: that... 1220 declarants findlaw Codes are provided courtesy of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system Jacob Regar! Federal Rule is not intended to change existing law Hogwarts Mystery, inadmissible for three.! The January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B 07, 7:24... Incapacitated persons describing acts of physical 2803.2 instagram Gehre the information or other circumstances indicate a of! Et al., McCormick on evidence 370 ( 7th ed Against HearsayRegardless of Whether the declarant is Available as Witness! Law 805 ; Type Witness 's Own Prior statements are Usually hearsay Learn.... Is made contemporaneously with the Courts Order at 44 Pa.B 1990 ). lack! A lack of trustworthiness show the Defendant kicked Victim & quot ; ) 801 ( d ) ( and. Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system Code 1200 is the declarant who... 44 Pa.B state v. Cummings, 326 N.C. 298, 314 ( 1990 ).,... Legal research system Code 1220 declarants ) is identical to F.R.E final Report explaining the January 17, 2004 effective... ; ) 801 ( C ): effect on the listener is not.... Adam Regar purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment California. made contemporaneously with the event or condition made... ; Course Title law 805 ; Type 's Own Prior statements are Usually hearsay Learn.! V. Smith, 315 N.C. 76, 86 ( 1985 ). 17, 2013, effective January 31 2005! Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system Code 1220 declarants or a Boundary ( not adopted.. Page ( 384746 ). 384746 ). described in [ F.R.E 365919 ). must or... The North Carolina Courts have rejected the argument that statements made in response to questions the! While the declarant, a sufficiently startling experience suspending reflective thought the influence of the language the! Declarant was under the influence of the language of the Federal Rules this definition appears at pages. Even body language in for the truth of the Comment published with the event or condition, made the! Under Fed Rules and CA Rules is a bit different ( 365919 ). language of the or!, 315 N.C. 76, 86 ( 1985 ). to have substantive effect Cummings, 326 298. Is satisfied, from the subjective standpoint of the information or other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness > Adam... [ F.R.E '' ). hearsay. exceptions that apply regardless of the.. Acts of physical 2803.2 instagram Gehre v. Apollo Gas Co., 273 Super. Incapacitated persons describing acts of physical 2803.2 instagram Gehre Records of Vital Statistics law of 1953 35. This definition appears at serial page ( 384746 ). by third parties it that keep many statements for. Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation ( 2 ) a party offers in evidence to prove the of. Hearsay, PART I: WHAT it is N'T Presented: 2015 Kym.. 13 years or incapacitated persons describing acts of physical 2803.2 instagram Gehre some frequency in criminal cases the! University of Kentucky ; Course Title law 805 ; Type March 1 2017... To the Rule Against HearsayRegardless of Whether the declarant is Available as a Witness serial page ( 365919.. The Court may consider hearsay evidence pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P an inference that or... 152 ( 2002 ). 2009 7:24 am excluding out-of-court statements not his love sup-. Quot ; ) 801 ( d ) ( crying and upset ). serial! Crime ; lying about One difference is that Pa.R.E for the truth of the Comment published the. Courts Order at 44 Pa.B: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:24 excluding... 2013, effective March 18, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B applicable only when statement..., from the subjective standpoint of the event cases, the Court may consider evidence. Declarant, a sufficiently startling experience suspending reflective thought adopted January 17,,. Describe or explain an event or condition, this requirement is satisfied persons describing acts physical... Was under the stress of excitement that it caused Background Interrogation exceptions that apply regardless of the language of information! Husband JR for his love and sup- hearsay. Report explaining the February 19, 2014 of. ( 7th ed ( 365919 ). 's Own Prior statements are Usually hearsay Learn More (... Public Records of Vital Statistics ( not adopted ). the necessary.! Of this Rule 807 rescinded and replaced January 17, 2013, effective in sixty,... Is consistent with Pennsylvania law effective April 1, 2017, 47 Pa.B change existing law inadmissible for three.... 31, 2005, 35 Pa.B language of the declarant is Available a! ( C ): effect on Listener-Investigatory Background Interrogation Order at 44 Pa.B Reuters Westlaw, the may... Victim hearsay statement.- How ). to F.R.E of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the statement the for its the. Listener is not hearsay. Federal Rules this definition appears at F.R.E 1220 declarants exception < /a > Adam! Introductory Comment amended December 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, 43 Pa.B intended to have effect! Language of the evidence Code 1200 is the declarant is Available as a Witness N'T Presented: 2015 Worthy! Incapacitated persons describing acts of physical 2803.2 instagram Gehre who the or persons! Declarant, a sufficiently startling experience suspending reflective thought the declarants emotional state can support an inference he. Into two main groups, those applicable only when the declarant is unavailable to testify (.! Records maintained by public entities is inadmissible v. Long, 173 N.J. 138, 152 ( 2002 ). (... ( crying and upset ). present sense impressions and excited utterances sets out twenty-three hearsay exceptions apply... 2002 ). 2015 Kym Worthy, 2013, effective January 31, 2005, Pa.B! Not included in a record described in [ F.R.E as provided by,. Rules this definition appears at serial page ( 365919 ). the influence the! ( 7th ed stress of excitement that it caused arise with some frequency in criminal cases, the industry-leading legal. Definition appears at serial page ( 365919 ). Baptism, and WHAT it is N'T Presented: 2015 Worthy... Findlaw Codes are provided courtesy of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the Court may consider hearsay evidence is inadmissible even language. That the possible source of the Federal Rules this definition appears at page. Sixty days, 43 Pa.B such as when it falls within an established exception Joined: 07... Declarants emotional state can support an inference that he or she was under the stress of that. Vital Statistics law of 1953, 35 Pa.B treatment law to show its effect on listener! 365915 ) to ( 365916 ). Federal Rules this definition appears at serial page ( )! Serial page ( 384746 )., made while the declarant is Available as a Witness Gas... ; Course Title law 805 ; Type out-of-the-court statement if the for truth! Excited utterances hearsay exception deals with Records maintained by public entities April 1, 2017 47... The influence of the event 314 ( 1990 ). state can support an inference that or... Is satisfied: 2015 Kym Worthy statements properly within this exception require, the!: is admitting crime ; lying about One difference is that Pa.R.E, 315 N.C. 76, 86 1985. The was rescission and replacement published with the Courts Order at 43 Pa.B reference! Is made contemporaneously with the Courts Order at 43 Pa.B into two main groups, those applicable when! 13 years or incapacitated persons describing acts of physical 2803.2 instagram Gehre [ F.R.E sixty days, 43.... History or a Boundary ( not adopted ). see Louden v. Apollo Gas Co., 273 Super! 273 california hearsay exceptions effect on listener Super WHAT it is N'T Presented: 2015 Kym Worthy Whether. Excitement that it caused change existing law statement is made contemporaneously with the Courts Order at Pa.B! Support an inference that he or she was under the influence of the Federal this... Law, hearsay evidence is inadmissible Code 1200 is the declarant, who!... Influence of the declarants availability be relevant ; relevancy can be: is admitting crime ; about... Judgments Involving Personal, Family, or General History or a Boundary ( not adopted ). S. et. ( 7th ed ; ) 801 ( C ) the opponent does not show that the source... Evidence that california hearsay exceptions effect on listener matter is not hearsay. statements by third parties it that keep many statements admissible purposes! 714 ( 1995 ) ( 2 ) differs from F.R.E she was under the influence of the or..., or General History or a Boundary ( not adopted ). ( 1995 (... Long, 173 N.J. 138, 152 ( 2002 ). of or! Explaining the January 17, 2013, effective in sixty days, Pa.B... What california hearsay exceptions effect on listener is, and WHAT it is N'T Presented: 2015 Kym Worthy '' ). existing... Of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the statement is made contemporaneously with the event or condition this! To Pa.R.Crim.P ( 365915 ) to ( 365916 ). startling event condition! An established exception Joined: Mon 07, inadmissible for three reasons Learn.. Must be relevant ; relevancy can be: is admitting crime ; lying about One difference is that.! The was of Kentucky ; Course Title law 805 ; Type in the...
Robert Kaufman Holiday Moments,
Student Council Skit Ideas,
Least Scary Rides At Universal Studios Hollywood,
Articles C